MODULE 3.5
COMBINATION RULES & TWO PHASE SYSTEMS
Objectives
- Understand the purpose of multiple criteria.
- Understand different combination rules.
- Understand the expected consequences of how many students are identified when applying different combination rules.
- Understand how two-phased systems can be used well or poorly.
Learning Tasks
- Watch Goal 3 Module 5 Part I Video
- Watch Goal 3 Module 5 Part II Video
- Watch Goal 3 Module 5 Part III Video
- Complete Goal 3 Module 5 Application Activity (recommended)
- Read Goal 3 Module 5 Additional Resources (recommended)
GOAL 3 MODULE 5 PART I
Watch the following video over Combination Rules & Two Phase Systems Part I.
GOAL 3 MODULE 5 PART II
Watch the following video over Combination Rules & Two Phase Systems Part II.
GOAL 3 MODULE 5 PART III
Watch the following video over Combination Rules & Two Phase Systems Part III.
Goal 3 Module 5 Application Activity
Find your state/district policy on gifted education.
If neither exists, visit the NAGC state definitions page and review.
- Are multiple criteria used? Which combination rule is used?
- How would the number of students identified change if we change to AND, OR, MEAN rules?
- What are some ways you could change identification practices to increase the number of students identified?
- What are the implications of different combinations rules for services?
- Look at the different criteria, which do you think would make for the best screener in a two-phase system?
Goal 3 Module 5 Additional Resources
Makel, M. C., Peters, S. J., Lee, L. E., Stambaugh, T., McBee, M., McCoach, D. B., & Johnson, K. (2023, January 13). Effective Identification through Multiple Criteria. EdArVix Preprints. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/48nv7
McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., & Waterman, C. (2014). Combining scores in multiple-criteria assessment systems: The impact of combination rule. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213513794
NEXT STEPS
After completing this module, you'll proceed to Module 6: Assessment Decisions Using CASA.
This work was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education (award number S206A200007 – 21) as part of the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program. The contributors to this site include Kiana Johnson, Lindsay Lee, Matt Makel, Matthew McBee, Betsy McCoach, Scott Peters, & Tamra Stambaugh.