MODULE 2.2
COST
Objectives
- Summarize historical issues of funding for gifted programs.
- Define and compare types of costs for gifted identification.
- Identify more cost-efficient universal screeners.
Learning Tasks
- Watch Goal 2 Module 2 Video
- Complete Goal 2 Module 2 Application Activity (recommended)
- Read Goal 2 Module 2 Additional Resources (recommended)
GOAL 2 MODULE 2
Watch the following video over cost.
Goal 2 Module 2 Application Activity
Create a list of assessments that could be used as a universal screener at your school district:
- Ability Tests
- Achievement Tests
- Teacher Rating Scales
- Others?
Cost Evaluation Reflection
- Determine assessments that are given to all students in the district that could be used as a universal screener.
- Ask yourself, "What is already 'in play' without additional costs?"
- Compare the costs of each assessment.
Download the Cost Evaluation Reflection Tool
Goal 2 Module 2 Additional Resources
Card, D., & Giuliano, L. (2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13678-13683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605043113
Baker, B. D., & McIntire J. (2003). Evaluating state funding for gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 25(4), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554225
Hodges, J. (2018). Assessing the influence of No Child Left Behind on gifted education funding in Texas: A descriptive study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(4), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18779343
Institute of Education Sciences. (2020). Cost analysis: A starter kit (Version 1).
https://ies.ed.gov/seer/pdf/IES_Cost_Analysis_Starter_Kit_V1.pdf
Rinn, A. N., Mun, R. U., & Hodges, J. (2020, July). 2018-2019 State of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://cdn.ymaws.com/nagc.org/resource/resmgr/2020-21_state_of_the_states_.pdf
NEXT STEPS
After completing this module, you'll proceed to Module 3: Alignment.
This work was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education (award number S206A200007 – 21) as part of the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program. The contributors to this site include Kiana Johnson, Lindsay Lee, Matt Makel, Matthew McBee, Betsy McCoach, Scott Peters, & Tamra Stambaugh.